PEPTIDES·INDEX
72 peptides412 listingsUpdated 56m agoBuild My Stack
Library

EloralintideWeight Loss / GLP-1

Selective amylin agonist; 48-week phase 2 weight data.

Rating3/5EmergingHuman dataSafety
Compare prices — from $54.00
StatusResearch only
FDA-approvedNO
PrescriptionNO
From$54.00

Overview

Eloralintide (LY3841136) is an investigational long-acting amylin receptor agonist developed by Eli Lilly for chronic weight management, given once weekly by subcutaneous injection. What distinguishes it from most compounds in the obesity pipeline is receptor preference: it is engineered to act at the amylin receptor without engaging the GLP-1, GIP or glucagon receptors that drive semaglutide, tirzepatide and retatrutide. It is not approved by the FDA for any use and remains investigational; it is sold here for research purposes only, not as a prescription medicine. Some vendors list it under the brand name "Elora."

How it works

Amylin is a hormone co-secreted with insulin from pancreatic beta cells that signals satiety, slows gastric emptying and blunts post-meal glucagon release. Eloralintide reduces appetite and food intake through this pathway, which runs parallel to — rather than overlapping with — incretin receptor agonism.

Structure#

Eloralintide is a 37-amino-acid, C-terminally amidated peptide (C201H319N49O65S2, 4526.10 g/mol, CAS 2883634-40-8) built as a stabilised analog of human amylin. Three engineered changes explain its behaviour:

  • Non-standard residues at positions 11, 15 and 22 replace the native amino acids, hardening the

peptide against enzymatic breakdown.

  • A methylene thioacetal bridge joins Cys2 and Cys7, in place of the disulfide bond found in

native amylin. Disulfides are chemically labile; the thioacetal is not, which is a large part of why this molecule survives in circulation where native amylin does not.

  • Lysine 26 is acylated with two γ-glutamate residues and a saturated 20-carbon diacid. This

fatty-diacid tail binds circulating albumin, and that albumin binding — not the peptide backbone itself — is what stretches the half-life far enough to support once-weekly dosing.

Native human amylin, by contrast, has a half-life of minutes. Essentially every structural decision above exists to convert a rapidly-degraded hormone into a weekly injectable.

Receptor selectivity#

Its receptor profile is preferential rather than absolute, and the distinction matters. In human receptor assays eloralintide favours AMY1R by roughly 12-fold over the calcitonin receptor and 11-fold over AMY3R. That is a meaningful bias, but a ~12-fold margin is not clean separation, and it should not be read as "does not touch the calcitonin receptor." What it does cleanly avoid is the incretin family — there is no GLP-1, GIP or glucagon receptor activity.

Because the gastrointestinal burden of incretin drugs is tied to GLP-1 receptor agonism, an amylin-preferring agonist offers a plausible route to appetite suppression with a different tolerability profile — which is also the rationale for the registered trials pairing it with tirzepatide.

Evidence

Phase 1 established proof of concept: across dose groups, weight reduction reached roughly 2.6% to 11.3% by week 12, and gastrointestinal adverse events were comparatively infrequent (nausea 8%, vomiting 4%, diarrhoea 10%), with decreased appetite (19%), headache (12%) and fatigue (11%) more common.

The substantive result is the 48-week phase 2 trial (NCT06230523) in 263 adults with obesity, or overweight with at least one obesity-related comorbidity, and without type 2 diabetes. All eloralintide arms met the primary endpoint of superiority to placebo in percent body-weight change:

ArmMean weight change at 48 weeks
1 mg−9.5%
3 mg−12.4%
6 mg−17.6%
9 mg−20.1%
6/9 mg escalation−19.9%
3/6/9 mg escalation−16.4%
Placebo−0.4%

Results were presented at ObesityWeek 2025 and published simultaneously in The Lancet.

In head-to-head rat work against cagrilintide, the two reduced food intake comparably at matched doses, but eloralintide produced significantly less conditioned taste avoidance — an animal proxy for nausea — and, over chronic dosing, equivalent fat-mass loss with less lean-mass loss. Both findings are preclinical and have not been demonstrated in humans.

Two caveats belong alongside the human numbers. This is a phase 2 trial of 263 participants, not a phase 3 outcomes study, and the comparator was placebo rather than an active incretin agonist — so the figures do not establish how eloralintide performs head-to-head against tirzepatide or semaglutide. Phase 3 and combination trials are registered but had not reported at the time of writing.

Safety

In the phase 2 trial the most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue, occurring more frequently at higher doses; slower dose escalation was associated with lower incidence, and the 1 mg and 3 mg arms showed frequencies similar to placebo. Phase 1 reported decreased appetite, headache and fatigue as the leading events, with nausea and vomiting relatively uncommon for a compound in this therapeutic area.

Because eloralintide remains investigational, there are no long-term human safety data, no approved indication, and no established contraindications or interaction profile. Every figure above comes from company-sponsored trials of limited duration. Research use only — nothing here is therapeutic guidance or a dosing recommendation.

Reported side effects

Reported in published literature and user reports. Not a complete list, and not medical advice.

  • Decreased appetite
  • Fatigue
  • Headache
  • Mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms, more frequent at higher doses
  • Nausea and vomiting (infrequent relative to incretin agonists — 8% and 4% in phase 1)
  • Diarrhoea

If severe or unexpected symptoms occur, contact a qualified medical professional. Peptides·Index does not provide medical advice.

Cautions discuss with a clinician

Use caution or avoid if
  • No established human contraindications exist because eloralintide is investigational; formal labeled contraindications have not been defined.
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding — no human safety data; weight-loss agents are generally avoided in pregnancy.
  • Known hypersensitivity to eloralintide or excipients; long-term human safety is uncharacterized.
Interactions
  • Incretin agonists (e.g. tirzepatide, semaglutide)Deliberately studied in combination in registered trials; additive appetite and gastrointestinal effects are plausible, but no formal interaction profile is established (research use only).

Timeline commonly reported

  1. Weeks 1–12

    Phase 1 saw weight reduction of roughly 2.6%–11.3% across dose groups by week 12, with gastrointestinal events infrequent relative to incretin agonists.

  2. Weeks 12–48

    In the 48-week phase 2 trial, weight loss continued to accrue across all dose arms rather than plateauing early.

  3. Week 48

    Phase 2 primary endpoint: mean weight reduction of 9.5% (1 mg) to 20.1% (9 mg) versus 0.4% for placebo.

FAQ

Is eloralintide FDA-approved?

No. Eloralintide is an investigational compound from Eli Lilly. It has completed phase 1 and a 48-week phase 2 trial and has not been approved for any use by the FDA or any other regulator. It is sold here research-use-only.

How is it different from cagrilintide?

Both are long-acting amylin receptor agonists, but eloralintide is engineered to favour the amylin AMY1R receptor — roughly 12-fold over the calcitonin receptor and 11-fold over AMY3R — whereas cagrilintide activates the calcitonin receptor to a comparable degree. That is a preference, not a clean separation. In rats the two cut food intake similarly, but eloralintide produced significantly less conditioned taste avoidance and less lean-mass loss.

What is eloralintide's chemical structure?

It is a 37-amino-acid, C-terminally amidated peptide. Three non-standard residues sit at positions 11, 15 and 22, the Cys2 and Cys7 residues are joined by a methylene thioacetal bridge in place of amylin's usual disulfide, and the lysine at position 26 carries two gamma-glutamate residues plus a 20-carbon diacid. That fatty-diacid chain binds albumin, which is what extends the half-life enough for weekly dosing. Its formula is C201H319N49O65S2 (4526.10 g/mol), CAS 2883634-40-8.

What weight-loss figures were reported?

In a 48-week phase 2 trial in 263 adults with obesity or overweight, mean weight reduction ranged from 9.5% in the 1 mg arm to 20.1% in the 9 mg arm, against 0.4% for placebo. Every dose arm met the primary endpoint. Results were presented at ObesityWeek 2025 and published in The Lancet.

Why is its tolerability described as favourable?

Amylin receptor agonism drives satiety through a different pathway than GLP-1 receptor agonism, and in trials the nausea and vomiting characteristic of incretin drugs were comparatively infrequent — phase 1 reported nausea in 8% and vomiting in 4%. In phase 2 the most common events were mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue, more frequent at higher doses, with the 1 mg and 3 mg arms close to placebo.

How was it dosed in trials?

By once-weekly subcutaneous injection. The phase 2 trial studied fixed 1, 3, 6 and 9 mg arms alongside stepwise escalation arms (6/9 mg and 3/6/9 mg). Slower escalation was associated with fewer adverse events. These are investigational regimens, not dosing guidance.

Is it being studied with other compounds?

Yes. Registered trials include eloralintide combined with tirzepatide, and combinations in people with type 2 diabetes. Those readouts are separate from the monotherapy phase 2 results above.

Sources

Starting references for the library summary. These are not dosing instructions or medical advice.

For research-use educational context only. Not medical advice and not a recommendation to use any compound. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before any health decision.